Donors and pro-Life conservatives are abandoning pro-abortion group MCCL after A4L exposure of their deceptive mailer about Senator Nathan Wesenberg. As described in our previous reporting, MCCL is opposing Wesenberg because they think he is TOO pro-Life and TOO conservative!
A4L received an email from a pro-Life conservative who stated that they were a monthly donor to MCCL but have since CANCELLED their monthly donations! This individual tells A4L that they did not know how crooked, corrupt, and evil MCCL was until we exposed it in our recent article. Senate candidate and former State Rep. Jeremy Munson also says he has heard from former MCCL donors who will no longer donate.
MCCL plays cover for the RINOs that vote to spend your tax dollars on abortion and Planned Parenthood. This group also made a pro-abortion commercial with Michele Tafoya and refuses to stand for Life, despite that being the reason they are supposed to exist.
Senator Nathan Wesenberg says MCCL opposed his life at conception bill and amendment and begged him not to introduce it. Wesenberg chose to be unwavering in his pro-Life principles and forced a vote to defund abortion, making him the first State Senator in MN to do so.
MCCL went on the attack against Wesenberg because he is a co-author of SF5225 which recognizes the Right to Life for pre-born children. MCCL falsely claims that this bill would allow all abortions when it is truly the opposite!
Also, many constituents of Wesenberg's district are skeptical if his primary opponent, Deb Holthaus, is pro-Life herself! Deer farmer Steve Porter, a former colleague of Holthaus', says that she is a secret Democrat who does not support Life.
This organization also tried to take the nearly $850,000 family trust fund from a man who committed suicide the day following his donation. Instead of returning the money to the grieving family, MCCL fought in court to strip the family of their life savings. To make matters worse, the son argues that MCCL knew his father was not of sound mind and knew he planned to commit suicide! MCCL was not allowed to keep the money following the judge’s ruling.
MCCL will continue their downward spiral as more Minnesotans learn that they are not a real pro-Life group. Action 4 Liberty has MASSIVE grassroots support because we always shoot you straight. We pull back the curtain to expose corruption while frauds like MCCL lie and deceive.
As seen in A4L President Erik Mortensen’s recent email, MCCL knows that pro-Life conservatives like Wesenberg would end their grift. If SF5225 were passed, their supposed mission would be accomplished. See portion of email below:
Action 4 Liberty will continue to provide Patriots with liberty-based reporting that cannot be found anywhere else.
The life issue is not going to go away with an amendment to the state constitution. We will have people smuggling baby poison pills into the state (when will the USPS enforce the Comstock Act?), and the pro-suicide euthanasia movement is still around. Besides that, we have a perverse sexual education curriculum in our public schools, one that former abortionist Abby Johnson revealed was deliberately designed to increase the market for abortions and STD treatment.
Lives are at stake here. We can’t afford to undermine our efforts by treating disagreements over strategy like ideological litmus tests instead of seeking reasonable accommodation in order to accomplish our goals. The pro-life movement went wobbly under Scott Jensen and David Hann in 2022. It was a disaster. MCCL should be bolder and take on the challenge of changing hearts in “moderate” districts instead of fearing to lose weak supporters. A4L needs to be realistic and address the weakness in the Wesenberg amendment. That weakness comes from fear of asking women to accept personal risk for their children (the “health” exception), but we ask our military and law enforcement ta accept greater risks for people they may not even know. The right to life is not secondary in one case versus another; it is held equally by mother and child. That’s what must be recognized in law; and upheld based on what is physically possible.